|
By Marcy Steinberg
Twenty architectural firms have submitted proposals
for a large public project. Five are invited to interview. Two go
in with top rankings based on their experience. Within moments of
beginning their presentation, one of those top firms is out of the
running. Later, the underdog firm - with a fraction of the leading
firm’s experience—wins the job.
I have watched this scenario in many selection interviews
and I have heard about it from procurement officials and buyers
throughout the country.
What’s going on?
Much to the dismay of many architects and engineers,
success in the interview is about something that seems nebulous
and patently unfair—Chemistry. Dick Corwin, a shopping center
developer in La Jolla, California, sums up what I have seen to be
true throughout both the private and public sectors:
“I look for chemistry, trust, style, and what
they’re trying to accomplish,” Corwin said.
In fact, of the six success factors I have noticed are key in the
interview process, chemistry outweighs experience, ideas, and knowledge
combined. Credibility comes in close to chemistry, followed by desire
for the job. That last is a tricky one to convey gracefully, but
the “chemistry basics” described here do the trick on
all six factors.
Generating Chemistry
If experience isn’t enough, and you are not
the world’s most magnetic person, what should you do—bring
such a person along to speak for you? NO. Your client wants to know
you and the team members who will be doing the work.
Fortunately, there is just one thing you need to focus
on to win that interview—your client, as opposed to yourself.
Tempe City Engineer Howard Hargis explained: “One architect
came in and spent most of his time bragging about past projects,
not the project he was interviewing for. It was a turn-off to everyone
in the room.”
Ken Kayes, facilities manager for Karsten Manufacturing
Corp, Phoenix, said, “The ones that impressed us the most
were the ones who knew about Karsten and talked about our project—not
the ones with fancy displays.”
Stacking Your Deck
To be able to talk magnetically about the client and
establish chemistry while also showcasing your knowledge, experience,
credibility, and desire for the job, you must research that client
extensively. Put far more time into this than any other preparation.
This will stack the deck in your favor, because so
many of your competitors don’t do it. And when they don’t,
the comments from the selection committee go something like this:
“They didn’t seem prepared. They didn’t do their
homework. They probably won’t listen or pay attention to our
needs. They don’t really know much about our project. They
don’t have any ideas about what we can do. They must not want
this job very much.”
On the other hand, more than once I have seen a small
architectural firm blow much larger, more experienced firms out
of the water with nothing more than a few inspiring slides, a colorful
outline of the client’s key specifications and major challenges,
and a blank easel for spontaneous drawing. They presented a variety
of ideas and demonstrated, with some slides and that blank easel,
a few ways that the firm had creatively addressed similar challenges
elsewhere, as well as ways they might address them for this client.
The comments following those presentations went like
this:
“The seemed to do more digging, they showed
they were really interested in us. They knew details about us. They
were innovative; they showed different aspects of what could be
done. We got an honest glimpse of their personalities. They’ve
given us extra to get this job; maybe that means they’ll give
us extra on the job.”
What About Visuals?
You have visited your client’s site, looked
into the issues that may impact planning, interviewed the building
team members and end users, learned about the client’s visions
and challenges for the project, and brainstormed creative ideas
to discuss (this last one is critical for the “methods and
approach” sections—don’t boilerplate it!).
Your final task, before dress rehearsal, is to prepare
the visuals and props. These play a critical role in your presentation.
Never lose sight of the fact that they play a supporting role. Remember
not to overwhelm people with countless boards switched every few
seconds, or PowerPoint shows that dominate the interview and do
not allow for eye contact and interaction. Minimize text—you
should be speaking, not reading.
Finally, consider using interactive models, maps,
drawings, or toys (both simple and technological) to get people
involved. You might just be able to engage them in the beginnings
of the creative process for which they are hiring you. Demonstrate
how good you are at getting their own ideas flowing. Because it’s
all about THEM—remember? That’s Chemistry.
First published in Sources and Design, Summer 2001
If you’d like us to notify you when future articles
are published on-line, subscribe to the Cynosure
Communications E-Mail Newsletter.
|